I really don’t know enough about
them. 3 million training courses sounds like a large deficit in the jobs market
which we might otherwise have noticed. On the one hand, government-subsidized
training for employers sounds like the government paying for job skills that a
company should plan and pay for; on the other hand, education is expensive and
a national good, and the government might legitimately contribute to it.
On balance, I
think that job-specific education is much less of a national good that is the
government’s business. Good general education creates engaged, well-informed
and cultured citizens who make a country a better place. Good job-specific
education earns the employer and employee more money.
One thing I can
say is that apprenticeships are demand-led: the government offers funding but
the apprenticeships themselves need employers, trainers and apprentices to come
together. Another 3 million is ambitious. Furthermore, apprenticeships are flawed because they are a legitimate way
of offering below the minimum wage. At the moment, many are simply excuses to
pay young people too little; apprenticeships are a form of indentured
servitude, forcing people to work in otherwise illegal poverty in order to get
training that they should be getting as a normal part of a job.
In this sense,
apprenticeships are part of a raft of policies that punish the young and force
them to earn less and take on more responsibility than the older generation.
Further education
institutions are also annoyed that apprenticeships are getting a lot of funding
when large cuts are being made to FE. Apprenticeships are a limited and narrow
type of education that are not applicable to all types of work. We left the
apprentice and master system behind when we moved away from guilds and feudal
government. If the government were really devoted to education and skills, FE
would see funding as well. Instead we have indentured servitude of the young.
We had 850,000
apprentices at last count, costing the government almost £1.5bn. Another 3 million at the
same average cost, if they were to be found, would be 3 million people earning
below the minimum wage and costing the government £5.3bn a year. The
Conservatives idly predicted that this new
policy will cost £300m a year. Only 1760% wrong.
No comments:
Post a Comment