Again,
I don’t have a problem with this one. But there is a problem with both of these
policies: they’re a waste of time. The amount of money that the government
loses from EU welfare or paying £3,000 extra to people with numerous benefits
claims is tiny. And by tiny, I mean in a government context. I’m sure any
person would appreciate £3,000 extra, but the government spends billions.
Government rounding errors are in the tens or hundreds of millions.
Furthermore, civil servants identify over 1,000 legal changes a year that are
needed and require parliamentary approval; Parliament gets through no more than
100. Every policy that takes ministers’ time pushes away long-standing needs in
the backlog.
It is, of course, right to pursue justice even when implementing it
might not seem cost-efficient. Justice is priceless. But negotiating with the
EU has so many more problems: loss of international respect, a lot of time and
money, possible withdrawal of benefits and tolerance for UK citizens abroad
etc. That’s why this policy is a waste of time. It’s more public relations
management, playing to voters’ fears rather than educate them about how
important these things actually are. I can just imagine someone in Conservative
head office thinking ‘we need to seem anti-EU and anti-benefits…. Hmm, let’s
put the two together: we’re against EU migrants getting benefits!’ Yet again,
the Conservatives have conflated a stroke of PR genius with sensible policy,
which is unacceptable from the party claiming to be responsible.
No comments:
Post a Comment