They have to
support themselves (previous policies have removed their benefits) and we want
them to leave? Why would we do that? If we were supporting them, that would
make sense: if there’s no work for their skills, we’re not going to pay them
forever. But if they’re bringing money into the country by supporting
themselves, why would we have a problem? If we accept the previous policy, we
ought to reject this one and vice versa. This policy is therefore a failure.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Emotions are wrong in relationships (and adults)
Facebook has been exploring showing me various relationship-related comments and statements, and it’s sad to see the range of advice tha...
-
Beneath the vaulted ceilings carved by mortal, striving hands, Where sunlight paints the stone with gold in hallowed lands, I wander thr...
-
They called him “good,” though horrors hid beneath his gentle air; A smiling mask that cloaked crimes no conscience ought to bear. F...
-
In youth, the world feels wide and firm, A blanket warm, of no fixed term. A goal once scored, a test once passed, Give reputations tha...
No comments:
Post a Comment