They have to
support themselves (previous policies have removed their benefits) and we want
them to leave? Why would we do that? If we were supporting them, that would
make sense: if there’s no work for their skills, we’re not going to pay them
forever. But if they’re bringing money into the country by supporting
themselves, why would we have a problem? If we accept the previous policy, we
ought to reject this one and vice versa. This policy is therefore a failure.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Impermanence
In youth, the world feels wide and firm, A blanket warm, of no fixed term. A goal once scored, a test once passed, Give reputations tha...
-
When you want equality with those who are doing well, you might think you have a clear case. There are privileged people out there who h...
-
In youth, the world feels wide and firm, A blanket warm, of no fixed term. A goal once scored, a test once passed, Give reputations tha...
-
In the UK we recently suffered the implementation of the 'Online Safety Act'. Labour assumes that it is wildly popular, with a m...
No comments:
Post a Comment