Monday, 31 August 2015

Conservative commitments - 19, 18 fails



Another sublimely hypocritical policy that ought to be in a comedy, not in reality. The Conservatives think that essential public services shouldn’t be disrupted by action based on undemocratic mandates. They define this as achieving at least 40% of the votes of everyone who could vote, as well as a majority of the people who do vote.
The Conservatives were elected with 37% of a 66% turnout, which is 24% of the electorate. According to their own beliefs, they have no mandate to interfere with health, education, fire and transport (the areas they want to subject to their new rule about strike action).
You could stop reading there and not miss much, but there is more detail. The Conservatives call this an important step to ‘rebalance the interests of employers, employees, the public and the rights of trade unions.’ Given that employees have already seen none of the economic growth of the last 15 years, the Conservatives should probably have written ‘further unbalance the interests’. This policy betrays the ideological antipathy Conservatives have to organized labour. As right-wingers in favour of deregulation and unfettered competition they should be lifting restrictions on unions, not creating more.
Speaking of which, the manifesto promises numerous other tweaks to regulations affecting unions. Some seem sensible, such as tackling ‘intimidation of non-striking workers’, but without further information this could as easily be a Trojan horse that limits the right of strikers to protest rather than protecting non-strikers.

No comments:

Post a Comment

The leader for this story is not a good leader

  Consistent and stoic, Leah Williamson is most natural of unnatural leaders | England women's football team | The Guardian ...